Comments on: IEEE finally ratifies the 802.11n standard http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2009/09/14/ieee-finally-ratifies-the-80211n-standard/ Enterprise mobility analysis Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:49:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Rajiv Iyer http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2009/09/14/ieee-finally-ratifies-the-80211n-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-471 Rajiv Iyer Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:58:07 +0000 http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=605#comment-471 Nice article on Tx Beamforming Paul. I noticed a small error. Cisco ClientLink technology does not work for 802.11b per its published document. Please see the website below. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html "And because it doesn't require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing 802.11a/g clients." Nice article on Tx Beamforming Paul. I noticed a small error. Cisco ClientLink technology does not work for 802.11b per its published document. Please see the website below.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html

“And because it doesn’t require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing 802.11a/g clients.”

]]> By: Paul DeBeasi http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2009/09/14/ieee-finally-ratifies-the-80211n-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-113 Paul DeBeasi Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:18:46 +0000 http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=605#comment-113 You are right. I spoke with an enterprise last week that asked me if I thought it was now "safe" to deploy 802.11n. But for most folks, the IEEE ratification is a "non-event". You are right. I spoke with an enterprise last week that asked me if I thought it was now “safe” to deploy 802.11n. But for most folks, the IEEE ratification is a “non-event”.

]]> By: Brian D. Johnson http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2009/09/14/ieee-finally-ratifies-the-80211n-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-112 Brian D. Johnson Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:28:54 +0000 http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=605#comment-112 There are some companies on the back edge of the adoption curve that want to be absolutely certain that it's done, done, done. Furthmore, it the IEEE is going to move onto gigabit, it would kind of make sense to know they are building on sand. There are some companies on the back edge of the adoption curve that want to be absolutely certain that it’s done, done, done.

Furthmore, it the IEEE is going to move onto gigabit, it would kind of make sense to know they are building on sand.

]]>