<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transmit beamforming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/</link>
	<description>Enterprise mobility analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:49:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Millener</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Millener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-513</guid>
		<description>, thank you for this latest information. Therefore, I would like to ask for your allowance to add some of this information in my blog. Of course, I will provide a link to your website, as a source of my mentioned information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>, thank you for this latest information. Therefore, I would like to ask for your allowance to add some of this information in my blog. Of course, I will provide a link to your website, as a source of my mentioned information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajiv Iyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv Iyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the follow up. Much appreciated.

Rajiv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the follow up. Much appreciated.</p>
<p>Rajiv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul DeBeasi</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul DeBeasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Hi Rajiv,

I checked with Cisco, and you are correct.  The Cisco Transmit Beamforming technology (Client Link) does not provide any benefits for 802.11b stations. Cisco is using some of the advanced 802.11n signal processing data to drive ClientLink. It is only computed for the 802.11a/g signals that use OFDM modulation, not the older CCK modulation used by 802.11b.

Thanks for your comment!
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rajiv,</p>
<p>I checked with Cisco, and you are correct.  The Cisco Transmit Beamforming technology (Client Link) does not provide any benefits for 802.11b stations. Cisco is using some of the advanced 802.11n signal processing data to drive ClientLink. It is only computed for the 802.11a/g signals that use OFDM modulation, not the older CCK modulation used by 802.11b.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul DeBeasi</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul DeBeasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Hi Rajiv,

Although the documentation specifically states &quot;802.11 g/a&quot;, my understanding is that ClientLink also works with 802.11b stations.  I am checking with Cisco on this and will post an update.

Thanks for your comment!
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rajiv,</p>
<p>Although the documentation specifically states &#8220;802.11 g/a&#8221;, my understanding is that ClientLink also works with 802.11b stations.  I am checking with Cisco on this and will post an update.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajiv Iyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv Iyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Nice article on Tx Beamforming. I noticed a small error. According to Cisco documentation, ClientLink does not work for 802.11b. I am not quite sure why this technology is limited to OFDM modulation.

You mention...

&quot;Cisco has introduced a proprietary form of TxBF called ClientLink. ClientLink can work with &lt;b&gt; 802.11b/g/a &lt;/b&gt;STAs because it requires no modifications in the STA.&quot;

Cisco mentions...

Source: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html

&quot;And because it doesn&#039;t require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing &lt;b&gt;802.11a/g clients &lt;/b&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article on Tx Beamforming. I noticed a small error. According to Cisco documentation, ClientLink does not work for 802.11b. I am not quite sure why this technology is limited to OFDM modulation.</p>
<p>You mention&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Cisco has introduced a proprietary form of TxBF called ClientLink. ClientLink can work with <b> 802.11b/g/a </b>STAs because it requires no modifications in the STA.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cisco mentions&#8230;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;And because it doesn&#8217;t require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing <b>802.11a/g clients </b>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
