<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MobileParadigm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileparadigm.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com</link>
	<description>Enterprise mobility analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Transmit beamforming by Rajiv Iyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv Iyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the follow up. Much appreciated.

Rajiv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the follow up. Much appreciated.</p>
<p>Rajiv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transmit beamforming by Paul DeBeasi</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul DeBeasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Hi Rajiv,

I checked with Cisco, and you are correct.  The Cisco Transmit Beamforming technology (Client Link) does not provide any benefits for 802.11b stations. Cisco is using some of the advanced 802.11n signal processing data to drive ClientLink. It is only computed for the 802.11a/g signals that use OFDM modulation, not the older CCK modulation used by 802.11b.

Thanks for your comment!
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rajiv,</p>
<p>I checked with Cisco, and you are correct.  The Cisco Transmit Beamforming technology (Client Link) does not provide any benefits for 802.11b stations. Cisco is using some of the advanced 802.11n signal processing data to drive ClientLink. It is only computed for the 802.11a/g signals that use OFDM modulation, not the older CCK modulation used by 802.11b.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transmit beamforming by Paul DeBeasi</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul DeBeasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Hi Rajiv,

Although the documentation specifically states &quot;802.11 g/a&quot;, my understanding is that ClientLink also works with 802.11b stations.  I am checking with Cisco on this and will post an update.

Thanks for your comment!
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rajiv,</p>
<p>Although the documentation specifically states &#8220;802.11 g/a&#8221;, my understanding is that ClientLink also works with 802.11b stations.  I am checking with Cisco on this and will post an update.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transmit beamforming by Rajiv Iyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2010/01/18/transmit-beamforming/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv Iyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=682#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Nice article on Tx Beamforming. I noticed a small error. According to Cisco documentation, ClientLink does not work for 802.11b. I am not quite sure why this technology is limited to OFDM modulation.

You mention...

&quot;Cisco has introduced a proprietary form of TxBF called ClientLink. ClientLink can work with &lt;b&gt; 802.11b/g/a &lt;/b&gt;STAs because it requires no modifications in the STA.&quot;

Cisco mentions...

Source: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html

&quot;And because it doesn&#039;t require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing &lt;b&gt;802.11a/g clients &lt;/b&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article on Tx Beamforming. I noticed a small error. According to Cisco documentation, ClientLink does not work for 802.11b. I am not quite sure why this technology is limited to OFDM modulation.</p>
<p>You mention&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Cisco has introduced a proprietary form of TxBF called ClientLink. ClientLink can work with <b> 802.11b/g/a </b>STAs because it requires no modifications in the STA.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cisco mentions&#8230;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;And because it doesn&#8217;t require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing <b>802.11a/g clients </b>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IEEE finally ratifies the 802.11n standard by Rajiv Iyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2009/09/14/ieee-finally-ratifies-the-80211n-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv Iyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=605#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Nice article on Tx Beamforming Paul. I noticed a small error. Cisco ClientLink technology does not work for 802.11b per its published document. Please see the website below.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html

&quot;And because it doesn&#039;t require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing 802.11a/g clients.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article on Tx Beamforming Paul. I noticed a small error. Cisco ClientLink technology does not work for 802.11b per its published document. Please see the website below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/white_paper_c11-516389.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;And because it doesn&#8217;t require any special feedback, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing 802.11a/g clients.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WPA Hack by Eufemia Stahley</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2008/11/19/wpa-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Eufemia Stahley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=68#comment-463</guid>
		<description>I am starting my own blog too, your is really nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting my own blog too, your is really nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What to ask before you buy a femtocell by Russell Yarbrough</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2009/11/21/what-to-ask-before-you-buy-a-femtocell/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Yarbrough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=639#comment-462</guid>
		<description>Well, the post is in reality the best on this worthy topic. I harmonise with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your incoming updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the exceptional lucidity in your writing. I will at once grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Gratifying work and much success in your business enterprize!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the post is in reality the best on this worthy topic. I harmonise with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your incoming updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the exceptional lucidity in your writing. I will at once grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Gratifying work and much success in your business enterprize!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where-oh-where is ultra-wide band? by E. Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2008/11/30/where-oh-where-is-ultra-wide-band/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=162#comment-460</guid>
		<description>This is an awesome netbook. Have had for 3 months now and have loved it all the while. Have traveled with as well use daily for note taking.  Extremely light and portable.  Still very usable I have no trouble typing at all even with my large hands.  The battery life was the huge selling point for me and it is truly awesome.  10 hours is a bit optimistic but you can count on 8 to 9 consistently.  All features worked excellently for me so far especially appreciate the touchpad lock button(great for taking notes) as well as the screen off function key.  The touchpad has a nice feel the zoom in and out can be tricky to use but the vertical and horizontal(in word) work really well.

Gripes-
Heat not unbearable but fan get annoying when studying in library
Keyboard is not as sturdy as I would like has some minor flex
Zoom feature is not as smooth as could be
heavy rearward weight bias so much that it wants to fall backwards(but wont) with the screen pushed back all the way
doesnt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an awesome netbook. Have had for 3 months now and have loved it all the while. Have traveled with as well use daily for note taking.  Extremely light and portable.  Still very usable I have no trouble typing at all even with my large hands.  The battery life was the huge selling point for me and it is truly awesome.  10 hours is a bit optimistic but you can count on 8 to 9 consistently.  All features worked excellently for me so far especially appreciate the touchpad lock button(great for taking notes) as well as the screen off function key.  The touchpad has a nice feel the zoom in and out can be tricky to use but the vertical and horizontal(in word) work really well.</p>
<p>Gripes-<br />
Heat not unbearable but fan get annoying when studying in library<br />
Keyboard is not as sturdy as I would like has some minor flex<br />
Zoom feature is not as smooth as could be<br />
heavy rearward weight bias so much that it wants to fall backwards(but wont) with the screen pushed back all the way<br />
doesnt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where-oh-where is ultra-wide band? by Emilio Skeele</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2008/11/30/where-oh-where-is-ultra-wide-band/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilio Skeele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=162#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Your website came up in my search and I&#039;m stricken by what you have published on this theme. I am currently diversifying my inquiry and thus cannot contribute further, even so, I&#039;ve bookmarked your internet site and will be returning to keep up with any next updates. Just Now love it and thanks for granting my comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your website came up in my search and I&#8217;m stricken by what you have published on this theme. I am currently diversifying my inquiry and thus cannot contribute further, even so, I&#8217;ve bookmarked your internet site and will be returning to keep up with any next updates. Just Now love it and thanks for granting my comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile UC products by 9753</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileparadigm.com/2009/07/20/mobile-unified-communication-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>9753</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileparadigm.com/?p=557#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Thanks this was a good read</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks this was a good read</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
